Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax and accounting research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
federal tax research
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research

Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software



Restaurateur's Attempt to Pin $1.6 Million Omission on Tax Accountant Fails.

(Parker Tax Publishing April 10, 2015)

The Tax Court determined a restaurant owner had vastly underreported his businesses income for multiple years, and found the taxpayer's attempt to shift blame to his accountant unconvincing. The court determined the omission was fraudulent, noting the taxpayer met multiple "badges of fraud," and imposed a 75 percent penalty. Musa v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo. 2015-58.

Alaa Musa formed Casablanca Restaurant, LLC (Casablanca) as a single-member limited liability company in 2005. The restaurant used an industry standard point-of-sale system to fulfil orders and record sales reports from cash and credit card purchases. Musa kept diligent records of credit card receipts, but he would frequently throw away the records of the cash receipts. Musa never deposited more than a minimal amount of Casablanca's cash receipts into the operating account and would generally take the cash home with him.

In early 2006, Musa hired J&M Accounting & Tax Services (J&M) to provide accounting and tax services for Casablanca. J&M prepared monthly sales tax returns for Casablanca based on sales numbers Musa provided over the phone. Musa did not provide J&M with copies of daily sales reports, and the sales numbers he provided were far below what was reflected on the reports.

The IRS audited Casablanca for 2006 to 2009, and issued a notice of deficiency. The audit found Musa had vastly underreported the restaurant's income in excess of $1.6 million, and the IRS assessed a civil fraud penalty under Code Sec. 6663(a).

Code Sec. 6663(a) imposes a 75 percent penalty equal to any part of any underpayment of tax if the underpayment is attributable to fraud. Courts have developed a nonexclusive list of "badges of fraud" to demonstrate fraudulent intent (Bradford v. Comm'r, 796 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1986)).

The Tax Court found multiple badges of fraud were present in Musa's conduct. For all the years the IRS audited, the court determined Musa: (1) underreported his income, (2) maintained inadequate records, (3) concealed income and assets from both his accountants and the IRS, (4) failed to file Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC, (5) filed false documents, (6) failed to make estimated tax payments, and (7) dealt extensively in cash. He also failed to cooperate with revenue agents during the audit, refusing to comply with multiple information document requests. Finally, Musa offered inconsistent and implausible explanations to the IRS and to the Tax Court for his behavior.

Musa argued that his accountant at J&M was to blame for the inaccuracies in his tax returns, claiming that J&M had access to his financial records and chose to underreport his income. The tax court found this unconvincing and implausible, noting that J&M did not have access to the point-of-sale reports until after the audit began, that Musa failed to disclose all of his bank accounts, and that he gave no explanation as to why his accountant would be motivated to prepare grossly inaccurate returns. Further, the court noted that under Metra Chem Corp. v. Comm'r, 88 T.C. 654 (1987), as a general rule, taxpayers cannot avoid the duty of filing accurate returns by placing responsibility on a tax return preparer.

Considering his conduct, the Tax Court found that Musa was liable for the Code Sec. 6663 civil fraud penalty for each year at issue.

For a discussion of the fraud penalty on underpayments of tax, see Parker ¶262,125. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!


James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

    ®2012-2018 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance