Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax and accounting research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
federal tax research
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software Federal Tax Research tax research

Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software



IRS Rejects Estate's Attempt to Retroactively Designate Trusts as IRA Beneficiaries

(Parker Tax Publishing July 2016)

The IRS ruled privately that because a decedent had designated his estate as his IRA's beneficiary at the time of his death, the IRA had no "designated beneficiary" for purposes of Code Sec. 401(a)(9) and the assets had to be paid out over the applicable distribution period in Reg. Sec. 1.401(a)(9)-5. The IRS also determined that a state court's order retroactively amending the designation to list trusts as the beneficiaries was ineffective because retroactive reformations cannot change the tax consequences of a completed transaction. PLR 201628004.


Under the facts of PLR 201628004, a decedent maintained two individual retirement accounts (IRAs) with a custodian and worked with financial advisors who were employed by that custodian. Consistent with his overall estate plan, the decedent named one trust as a 50 percent beneficiary, and two other trusts each as 25 percent beneficiaries of the IRAs in a year after his required beginning date under Code Sec. 401(a)(9).

Later that year, the decedent's financial advisors joined another firm and became affiliated with a different custodian, and the decedent met with one of the advisors to facilitate the transfer of the IRA assets to that custodian. The financial advisor provided a beneficiary designation form for the decedent's signature, naming the decedent's estate as the sole beneficiary. The decedent signed that form and the assets of the two IRAs held by the original custodian were directly transferred to a new IRA held by the new custodian.

Although the decedent signed the beneficiary designation form, he intended only to move assets from the first custodian to the second, and he did not intend to change beneficiaries as part of the transaction. After the decedent's death, the trustees of the trusts petitioned a state court for a declaratory judgment that would modify the beneficiary designation for the new IRA to carry out the original estate plan (i.e. one trust as a 50 percent beneficiary, and the two other trusts each as 25 percent beneficiaries). Based on its finding of the decedent's intent, the court granted the order, retroactively effective as if the designation were made on the date the decedent signed the beneficiary designation form for the new IRA.

The decedent's estate requested a ruling from the IRS that the life expectancy (as set forth on the

Single Life Table at Reg. Sec.1.401(a)(9)-9, Q&A-1) of the beneficiary of one of the three trusts could be utilized to determine the Code Sec. 401(a)(9) "applicable distribution period" with respect to the portion of the IRA that was payable to that trust.


Reg. Sec. 1.408-8, Q&A-1(a) provides that an IRA is subject to the required minimum distribution rules provided in Code Sec. 401(a)(9). For purposes of applying these rules, the IRA trustee, custodian or issuer is treated as the plan administrator, and the IRA owner is substituted for the employee.

Reg. Sec. 1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A-3 provides that only individuals may be designated beneficiaries for purposes of Code Sec. 401(a)(9). A person who is not an individual, such as the employee's estate or a charitable organization, may not be a designated beneficiary. If a person other than an individual is designated as a beneficiary of an employee's benefit, the employee will be treated as having no beneficiary for purposes of Code Sec. 401(a)(9), even if there are also individuals designated as beneficiaries. In addition, under Reg. Sec. 1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A-4, in order to be a designated beneficiary an individual must be a beneficiary as of the date of the employee's death.

Reg. Sec. 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(c)(3) provides, in general, that with respect to an employee who does not have a designated beneficiary, the applicable distribution period measured by the employee's remaining life expectancy is the life expectancy of the employee using the age of the employee as of the employee's birthday in the calendar year of the employee's death. In subsequent calendar years, the applicable distribution period is reduced by one for each calendar year that has elapsed after the calendar year of the employee's death.

The IRS determined that because the decedent's estate was named as the beneficiary of the IRA at the time of his death, and because an estate cannot qualify as a "designated beneficiary" for purposes of Code Sec. 401(a)(9), the IRA did not have a "designated beneficiary." Because the decedent died after the required beginning date and without a "designated beneficiary," the IRS ruled that the assets of the IRA must be paid out over the applicable distribution period described in Reg. Sec. 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(c)(3).

The IRS noted that although the state court order changed the beneficiary of the IRA under state law, the order could not create a "designated beneficiary" for purposes of Code Sec. 401(a)(9).

The IRS observed that courts have held that the retroactive reformation of an instrument is not effective to change the tax consequences of a completed transaction. For example, the IRS said, the Tax Court considered the impact of a judicial reformation of a trust agreement for tax law purposes in Estate of La Meres v. Comm'r, 98 T.C. 294 (T.C. 1992). In La Meres, a state probate court order approved the post-death amendment of a trust to eliminate a provision that caused adverse estate tax results, and held that such amendment was retroactively effective as of the date of the decedent's death. The Tax Court held that such reformation was not effective for tax purposes, explaining that while courts will look to local law in order to determine the nature of the interests provided under a trust document, courts are not bound to give effect to a local court order that modifies the dispositive provisions of the document after the IRS has acquired rights to tax revenues under its terms.

For a discussion of required distributions from IRAs, see Parker Tax ¶134,570.

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!


James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

    ®2012-2017 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance