Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax research
Parkers Tax Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
CPA software
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research

Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software



IRS Clarifies Terms Relating to the Economic Substance Doctrine.
(Parker Tax Publishing October 30, 2014)

The IRS has provided additional guidance on the codification of the economic substance doctrine and related penalty amendments. Notice 2014-58.

The economic substance doctrine is a judicially created rule, now codified under Code Sec. 7701(o), that disallows tax benefits if the transaction that produces those benefits lacks economic substance or a business purpose. Under Code Sec. 7701(o)(1), a transaction has economic substance if: (1) the transaction changes in a meaningful way (apart from federal income tax effects) the taxpayer's economic position; and (2) the taxpayer has a substantial purpose (apart from federal income tax effects) for entering into the transaction. Code Sec. 7701(o)(5)(D) provides that the term "transaction" includes a series of transactions. The legislative history of Code Sec. 7701 explained that it was not meant to alter a court's ability to aggregate, disaggregate, or otherwise recharacterize a transaction when applying the economic substance doctrine. However, the code does not define "transaction."

Code Sec. 6662(b)(6) imposes a penalty on an underpayment attributable to tax benefits that were disallowed because a transaction lacks economic substance or fails to meet the requirements of any similar rule of law. Neither Code Sec. 7701(o) nor Code Sec. 6662 defines "similar rule of law." However, the legislative history provides that, with respect to a "similar rule of law," the penalty would apply to a transaction that is disregarded as a result of the application of the same factors and analysis that is required under Code Sec. 7701(o) for an economic substance analysis, even if a different term is used to describe the doctrine.

In Notice 2014-58, the IRS provided a definition of "transaction" for purposes of the economic substance doctrine. The notice states that a transaction "generally includes all the factual elements relevant to the expected tax treatment of any investment, entity, plan, or arrangement; and any or all of the steps that are carried out as part of a plan." Furthermore, the IRS clarified that a facts and circumstances analysis will determine whether a plan's steps are aggregated or disaggregated when defining a transaction, focusing on whether particular steps are necessary to accomplish non-tax goals. The IRS elaborated that the economic substance doctrine's application and a transaction's character as an aggregation or disaggregation will be determined on a case-by-case basis in light of the facts and circumstances.

The IRS also advised that, for purposes of Code Sec. 6662(b)(6), "similar rule of law" means a rule or doctrine that disallows the tax benefits related to a transaction because: (1) the transaction does not change a taxpayer's economic position in a meaningful way (apart from federal income tax effects); or (2) the taxpayer did not have a substantial purpose (apart from federal income tax effects) for entering into the transaction.

In other words, "similar rule of law" means a rule or doctrine that applies the same factors and analysis that is required under Code Sec. 7701(o) for an economic substance analysis, even if a different term or terms (for example, sham transaction doctrine) are used to describe the rule or doctrine.

The IRS said that it will not apply a penalty under Code Sec. 6662(b)(6) unless it also raises Code Sec. 7701(o) to support the underlying adjustments. If the IRS instead relies on other judicial doctrines (e.g., the step-transaction doctrine) to disallow claimed tax benefits and to support underlying adjustments, the IRS will not apply a Code Sec. 6662(b)(6) penalty.

Notice 2014-58 is effective for transactions entered into after March 30, 2010.

For a discussion of the economic substance doctrine, see Parker Tax ¶99,730. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!


James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

    ®2012-2018 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance