Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax and accounting research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
federal tax research
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software tax research

Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

CPA Tax Software



Tax Court: Rural Doctor Received Cancellation of Debt Income Stemming from Forgiveness of Incentive Loans.

(Parker Tax Publishing May 5, 2015)

The Tax Court held that a hospital's forgiveness of loans provided as an incentive for a physician to establish a practice in rural Florida gave rise to cancellation of debt income. The court disagreed with the physician's contentions that he was not personally liable for the loan. Wyatt v. Comm'r, T.C. Summary 2015-31.


In 2006, Darrel Wyatt, a physician board certified in obstetrics and gynecology, moved to Putnam County, Florida and became affiliated with the Putnam Community Medical Center (hospital). Putnam County is in a medically underserved rural area of Florida, and the hospital recruited Wyatt as part of its effort to better serve the community's health needs.

In July of 2006, Wyatt and the hospital entered into a recruiting agreement whereby the hospital agreed to help Wyatt establish his practice in exchange for his commitment to practice in the area. An addendum to the agreement established a loan program, through which the hospital guaranteed gross payments of $32,953 a month and agreed to loan Wyatt the difference between that amount and the actual income he received from his practice each month for a year (the "guarantee period").

At the end of this guarantee period, Wyatt was required to immediately repay the loans, unless he requested a deferred payment plan and signed a promissory note. However, if Wyatt remained within Putnam County and continued his practice after the end of the guarantee period, the hospital agreed to forgive the loans ratably over a three year period.

During his first year, Wyatt received loans of $260,627 from the hospital pursuant to the agreement. After the one-year guarantee period, Wyatt remained in Putnam County practicing medicine and maintained his affiliation with the hospital. Over the next four years, the hospital forgave the loans in recognition of Wyatt's continuing service, as per the agreement. Wyatt did not request a deferred payment plan, and did not execute a promissory note or grant the hospital a perfected security interest in his accounts.

On his tax returns for 2007 to 2010, Wyatt included as "Other income" on his Schedule C attachments the amounts forgiven and canceled by the hospital, consistent with the Forms 1099-MISC that he received from the hospital. Wyatt reported total tax of $37,995 on his return for 2008, and $32,625 for his 2009 return. After Wyatt failed to pay any part of his tax liability for 2009, the IRS issued a notice of intent to levy for that year.

Wyatt sought to compromise his liabilities for 2007 through 2010, the four years for which the hospital forgave the loans. He offered to pay $20,055 in satisfaction of his outstanding tax liabilities, which was equivalent to the taxes for those years without regard to the canceled amounts, claiming there was doubt as to his liability for the canceled loans. The IRS rejected the offer and issued a notice of determination addressing only the 2009 tax year.


A debt of a taxpayer that is discharged by the creditor generally must be included in the gross income of the taxpayer (Code Sec. 61(a)(12)).

The Tax Court noted that both Wyatt and the IRS agreed that the payments Wyatt received from the hospital pursuant to the agreement represented a bona fide loan. However, Wyatt contended that the loan was a nonrecourse loan (i.e., that he was not personally liable for its repayment), and that, as a consequence, he did not receive income when the loan was forgiven and canceled by the hospital. Wyatt claimed that because he never signed a promissory note, he was not obligated to repay the loan.

The court disagreed with this characterization, stating that the fact Wyatt never executed a promissory note was not determinative of his personal liability for the loan. The court noted that if he had failed to honor his part of the bargain, there was nothing in the agreement that would have barred the hospital from suing him to recover the unrepaid loan amount. The court pointed out that the agreement required repayment of the loan immediately upon completion of the guarantee period unless he requested a deferred payment plan. Although Wyatt did not formally request a deferred payment plan, the hospital did not choose to demand immediate payment because he remained in the community, continued his medical practice, and maintained his affiliation with the hospital, and the hospital found it unnecessary to pursue any collection remedy against him.

The court found that the hospital assumed the risk of being an unsecured creditor, presumably because it had faith that Wyatt would fulfill his side of the bargain by remaining in Putnam County. But the court noted the assumption of that risk by the hospital did not negate the fact that a loan existed for which Wyatt was personally liable. Additionally, even if the loan was nonrecourse, the court observed that just because a taxpayer is not personally liable for a debt does not mean that cancellation of indebtedness cannot give rise to income (Gershkowitz v. Comm'r, 88 T.C. 984 (1987)).

The Tax Court held that because Wyatt had paid nothing to the hospital on his loan after the one-year guarantee period and the hospital forgave the balance of the loan ratably over the course of the next 36 months, Wyatt had received income from cancellation of indebtedness and was required to include those amounts on his 2009 return.

For a discussion of income from the discharge of indebtedness, see Parker Tax ¶ 72,300. (Staff Editor Parker Tax Publishing)

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!


James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution.

    ®2012-2018 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance